DVD, Superman III (1983) film
As I understand it the Superman films are supposed to go: first one good, second one better, third one not good (and don't even mention the fourth one), but I feel I must challenge conventional wisdom (not about the fourth one) by saying first one good, second one not good, third one good again.
Though 'Superman III' doesn't start with the famous John Williams score, as much a part of the character since it was created as the big 'S' on his chest, it does start with a humourous, busy and wholly enjoyable sequence that looks really good - kind of a mini review of the whole film there. The blurred edges gave it a special look, and things get off to a pacy and amusing start. In previous viewings I have a vague sense that I found Richard Pryor's character rather annoying, but after seeing Otis in the first two films recently he was a positive asset to the production. The change of cast, with Lois Lane only there for a couple of cameo bookend scenes, along with Perry White and Jimmy, and Lex Luthor's complete absence actually helped the film. It gave room for Pryor's Gus Gorman to expand a bit, and introduced the excellent Annette O'Toole, latterly of 'Smallville', as Clark Kent's childhood sweetheart Lana Lang. There was also room for more ideas, and less of the inconsistent or ridiculous moments of the second film, in particular.
While there were moments of stupidity, they were less frequent or memorable - little things such as the 'walk/don't walk' men in the traffic light having a scrap, or Lana not finding it strange that Clark's vanished, yet Superman, the same height, hair colour, etc, just happened to be in the neighbourhood to save her son Ricky. Or that Supes can go at super speeds when he's flying around in the canyons, but takes a long time to fly a few hundred metres to get to Ricky in the field. Or that he takes the time to change into his outfit when he could simply run over there before the combines get close. But even in those moments, this time I could find things to applaud. In film two I found it very irritating that Clark turns into Superman as he's running along and his clothes just vanish, but here they show the same scene through a fence which looks a lot better. Dropping a lake's worth of ice on a building would probably flatten the building, but perhaps Superman used his heat vision to melt it, and suspension of disbelief becomes easier than it was watching the previous film.
The money is on screen, for sure. The second film in my eyes seemed a bit cheaper, with less impressive sets some of the time, but in this one the locales are varied, colourful and impressive, whether it's the villain's penthouse ski-slope, or the evil computer cave. It helped that the visuals looked cleaner, sharper and brighter, and the audio was better. Technical issues had been worked out and things looked more real, if not perfect. The first film had the Krypton sequences and Clark's growing up, and this film has a return to Smallville, which gives us a better picture of Clark as a person. We hear Mrs. Kent died, see the high school he went to, and most importantly Lana is part of events. For those of us that have enjoyed 'Smallville' the TV series, it's funny to imagine Brad is what Whitney might have turned into!
There's a lot of energy, though it doesn't sustain itself all the way through and I can imagine it would be better if edited slightly tighter, since some scenes are unnecessary to the plot, such as it is. The Superman films have never had strong storylines, partly because the nature of the character is that he goes around saving people, moving from one stunt sequence to the next, and the villains didn't have a particularly inspired plan or two. I can understand Lois Lane's involvement, or Lex Luthor's, in the Superman mythos, but one archetype completely pointless is the ditzy gum-chewing girl (whether she actually chewed gum or not), which seems to have accidentally become a staple of these films. Over all the villains weren't too bad (though I always think Lex is going to be in it!), and even now I find the moment when that woman gets pulled into the machine and robotized rather creepy. I didn't remember she survived, that must have been one for the children.
The part with the supercomputer could be a separate film, in that it's not really related to the rest of the story, but these things didn't bother me as much for some reason. It may have been because I had low expectations before watching it, yet had higher expectations while watching the second film, as it can have an effect on perception of enjoyment. But I have to say the humour mostly worked, the brightness and quality of the widescreen picture helped smooth some edges and a break from the normal characters gave it its own something. I haven't even mentioned the good Superman, bad Superman. This might have been a problem for me, but I felt this fight, as good as it was, actually happened inside Superman's mind, representing the inner turmoil he was experiencing. Reeve's turn as evil Superman, flicking nuts and smashing glass bottles or lurching around with a surly sneer was great - even his suit was a few shades darker. Reeve looked on top form in this film and it worked better as a result. There was even room for in-jokes, when Gus notes he can't believe a man can fly, the inverse of the first film's tagline: 'You will believe a man can fly.'
It was an unexpected surprise, and though not a great film, it was a good, enjoyable installment, trying different things, mostly satisfying in the action department, not too many slow and boring moments, and worth watching. Even the end credits were better with the novelty of seeing how many there were as they streamed toward the screen!
***